+30 2310 250060
·
[email protected]
·
MONDAY - FRIDAY 09:00-21:00
MAKE AN APPOINTMENT

Abusive terms in an employment contract - The no. 630/21 Decision of the Athens Court of First Instance

The no. 630/21 Decision of the Single Member Court of First Instance of Athens, on a case successfully handled by our office, dismissed a suit by a former employer company against an employee seeking damages for breach of a post-contractual non-competition and confidentiality clause and awarded costs to the latter 2,000.00 euros. The employer was entitled to an amount of more than 80,000.00 euros as forfeiture of criminal clauses in the employment contract, as well as compensation and moral damage. 

In particular, it was held that “an agreement whereby the weaker of the contracting parties is exploited because of his need or inexperience and is obliged to exercise the rights deriving from the contract, to undergo legal battles under particularly unfavorable conditions, may be considered contrary to morals therefore, either due to ignorance of the language of a foreign country, or due to the difficulty of staying in a foreign country without work, or due to the inability to entrust the defense of his case to a suitable legal representative or due to procedural or other obstacles or disadvantages as a result of which he does not venture any action thereby depriving him of his legal rights“.

The employer's choice to use the abusive extension of jurisdiction clause and to sue the employee in Athens, instead of Thessaloniki, which is the latter's place of work and residence, was criticized by the Court, which ruled that: 

In this case, it is clear that the conclusion of the extension is the product of the exploitation of the need of the plaintiff, who was in a weaker position when seeking work and could not negotiate the content of the contract proposed by the plaintiff“.

Subsequently, the Court ruled that it is not enough to report that the employee breached his obligations, but it should "to be sufficiently determined and in what exact way the plaintiff breached his obligations, since the secrets for which he did not keep confidential are not clearly stated, and what confidential information was provided to her competitor by his new employer", rejecting the Teaching as a whole as vague. 

Next is the no. 630/21 Decision of the Single Member Court of First Instance of Athens


COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF ATHENS

PROCEDURE OF PROPERTY DISPUTES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DISPUTES

630/2021

THE SINGLE-MEMBER COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF ATHENS

CONSOLIDATED by Judge Michael Philippa, Court of First Instance, who was appointed by the President of the Three-Member Administrative Council of the Court of First Instance of Athens, and by the Secretary Georgia Karatsalo.

MEETED publicly in his audience on the 29ththe September 2021, to try the case between:

OF THE PLAINTIFF: A company with the name of …., which was represented by the attorney of … of the Athens Bar Association.

OF THE DEFENDANT: ….., who appeared after his Attorney Thomas Kalokiris with A.M. 11982 of the Thessaloniki Bar Association.

[…] During the discussion of the case and its presentation by the relevant board, the attorneys of the parties developed their claims and requested that what is mentioned in the minutes of the public meeting of the Court and the written proposals they submitted be accepted.

AFTER STUDYING THE LITIGATION
THOUGHT ACCORDING TO THE LAW

[….]From the provision of article 42§1 sec. 1 of the Civil Code, it follows that a first-instance regular court that is not territorially competent can, by express or implied agreement of the parties, become competent, unless it is a matter of disputes that do not have a property object, while from the provision of article 43 of the same Code, it follows that the agreement of the parties by which an ordinary Court becomes competent for future disputes is valid only if it is in writing and refers to a certain legal relationship, from which the disputes will arise. Besides, from the provision of article 44 of the Civil Code, it follows that the agreements according to articles 42 and 43 of the Civil Code create exclusive jurisdiction, unless the contract itself states otherwise. It follows from the above provisions that the agreement of the parties by which a regular Court becomes exclusively competent for future disputes is valid only if it is in writing and refers to a certain legal relationship, from which the disputes will arise. This agreement is a contract of a procedural nature, since the above provisions provide for the cases in which it is permitted and define the conditions under which it can be drawn up, which extends the local jurisdiction of the civil Courts (see EfATH 106 /2018, Efves 1823/2014 T.N.P. LAW, EfPir 364/1998 HellDni 1998 p. 897). Finally, in accordance with the provision of article 46 of the Civil Code, if the Court is not competent in terms of content or location, it shall rule on this ex officio at each stage of the trial and determine the competent Court, to which it refers the case, and the investigation of jurisdiction , because it is a procedural condition for the conduct of the trial, according to article 73 of the Civil Code, it concerns public order and precedes the investigation of any procedural and substantive objection, as well as the investigation of the legal merits of the action (see AP 784/ 1971 NoB 20, p. 485, EfATH 3159/2011 HellDni 2012, p. 161, Nika in Keramea/Kondyli/Nika, Interpretation KPolD, ed. 2000, article 46, number 6, p. 107). The agreement on the extrapolation of territorial jurisdiction is, as stated above, a procedural contract and for this reason is not subject to review under Article 281 of the Civil Code, because based on the evaluative criteria established by this article, the exercise of only those rights which derive from the substantive and not from those derived from procedural law (see AP 604/2018, AP 639/2012 T.N.P. LAW, EfThes 1823/2014 ibid.), in terms of which, however, application Article 116 of the Civil Code applies, which also requires the conduct of the trial in good faith and in accordance with good morals, without, however, otherwise providing for the nullity of the procedural act acted in violation of it {see AP 563/20 Io, AP 1595/2014, AP 1414/2011 T.N.P. LAW). Furthermore, according to the provisions of Articles 178 and 179 of the Civil Code, any legal act that is contrary to good morals is invalid, as is also the case with which the freedom of the person is excessively bound. This restriction is also subject to the agreement by which a court with no local jurisdiction, pursuant to articles 42, 43 and 44 of the Civil Code, becomes exclusively competent for adjudicating property disputes, which have arisen or will arise in the future between the interested parties . In particular, an agreement in which the weaker of the contracting parties is exploited due to need or inexperience and is obliged, in order to exercise the rights deriving from the contract, to undergo legal battles with particularly unfavorable conditions for this, either due to ignorance of the language of a foreign country, or due to the difficulty of staying in a foreign country without work, or due to the inability to entrust the defense of his case to a suitable legal representative or due to procedural or other obstacles or disadvantages resulting in Do not dare any action and thus deprives its legal rights (see CA 977/1985 Nov 1986, p. ..N.P.. LAW, BrPair 66/2021 posted on the website of the issuing Court, MonProTATH 2024/2013 T.N.P. LAW).

[..] En in this case, the plaintiff states in her current action that she maintains a business.... in Thessaloniki. That by virtue of the 25-1-2019 indefinite-term dependent employment contract, he hired the defendant as a full-time employee. That the written employment contract contained confidentiality and non-competition clauses during the validity of the contract and for six months after its termination, under the threat of a penalty clause equal to the equivalent of 12 monthly salaries. That the plaintiff violated these terms and the obligation of loyalty to his employer, and specifically, after receiving copies of the client list ..[..] and making contacts [..], he voluntarily left his job and immediately started working with a competing company , in which he disclosed confidential information of his previous employer, even succeeding in seducing two trainees [...] And that in this way he caused her a financial loss due to the loss of receipts from tuition fees, and caused her moral damage. It requests, for these reasons, after an admissible and legal partial limitation of the request of the lawsuit, from an entirely negative vote to a partial recognition, made with its proposals (which, being clearer and referring to a smaller amount, prevails over the different content and vague oral statement of her attorney at the hearing on the objection of the amount of 20,000 euros, which is contained in the minutes of the public meeting of the Court at the same time as this decision), that the defendant be obliged to pay her the amount of 19,568.16 euros as a forfeiture penalty clause , to be recognized as having to pay her in addition the amount of 40,000.00 euros as compensation and as monetary satisfaction for her moral damage the amount of 30,000.00 euros, to deport the defendant in personal custody as a means of executing the decision that will be issued , to declare the decision temporarily enforceable, and to order the defendant to pay the court costs. With this content and requests, this action, for the counter-voting request of which the payment of a formal court fee is not required, since it does not exceed the amount of 20,000.00 euros, which is the minimum threshold for exemption from the payment of the court fee provided for in labor disputes official document (71 EsNKPolD in conjunction with the regulation of article 14 par. 2 of the KPolD on the monetary limit of the substantive jurisdiction of the Magistrate's Courts), was duly filed and is being brought to be discussed before this Court, the objection raised regarding the jurisdiction of the Court being rejected .

In particular, the plaintiff invokes, in order to establish the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, a clause according to articles 42 and 44 of the Civil Code of Extrajurisdiction which was included in the 25-1-2019 contract of dependent work that she concluded with the defendant. The defendant, for his part, pleads that this extrapolation of jurisdiction clause is invalid as abusive, because it is a general transaction term that the defendant placed as a pre-formulated term in all non-negotiated employment contracts, with the aim of making it difficult for the employees to represent themselves in the future in the Court, and that in this case the Courts of Thessaloniki are competent, since it is the defendant's place of residence, provision of work and existence of a branch of the employing company. In this case, it is clear that the conclusion of the extension is the product of the exploitation of the need of the plaintiff, who was in a weaker position when seeking work and could not negotiate the content of the contract proposed by the plaintiff. However, in concreto the rights and obligations of the parties were not unduly disturbed, since the Courts of the capital of the state were designated as competent, in which representation is easy and does not cause prohibitive costs, and the plaintiff was in fact not prevented from defending himself of having appeared before the Court after his witnesses and no specific procedural harm is invoked due to the extrapolation of the Court's jurisdiction. In this regard, it does not appear that the invocation of the extrapolation of jurisdiction by the plaintiff in her petition, as a procedural act, constitutes an abuse of a procedural right in violation of Article 116 of the Civil Code.

However, the action must be dismissed as inadmissible for indefiniteness. First of all, regarding the request for forfeiture of the penalty clause, it is not specified in the documents whether the forfeiture is requested due to a violation that occurred before or after the termination of the employment contract, and based on which provision of the contract is requested, the one concerning the during the contract breach of the employee's obligations or the one concerning his obligations after the termination of the contract. The document contains cumulatively and in a vague manner factual incidents that relate to both of these cases, so that no conclusion can be drawn, and any admission that both cases are invoked cumulatively leads to a conclusion of indeterminacy as to the amount of the request concerning each. In this regard, it is not sufficiently specified and in what exact way the plaintiff breached his obligations, since the secrets for which he did not keep confidential are not clearly mentioned, and what confidential information was provided to his competitor by his new employer, except that reference is made to the dispatch of trainees, without even mentioning their number as an estimate. With regard to the compensation request, in addition to the above, it is not specified what exactly was the damage suffered, since the amount of 40,000.00 euros is vaguely mentioned without mentioning the way it was calculated, except that tuition fees in the amount of 3,000 are mentioned. 00 and 6,000.00 euros, which are not even multiples of the amount requested, so that no safe conclusion can be drawn. These entail autonomy and the request for the award of monetary satisfaction, since it is not described in the petition. in a certain way the wrongful act allegedly caused moral damage. Pursuant to all of the above, the lawsuit must be rejected as inadmissible due to vagueness, and the plaintiff, due to her defeat, must be sentenced according to article 176 of the Civil Code, to pay the defendant his court costs, according to the specific provisions of the ordinance.

FOR THOSE REASONS

HE JUDGES against the objection of the parties.

DISMISSES the action.

CONDEMNING the plaintiff to pay the defendant as his court costs the amount of two thousand (2.000,00) euro.


Thomas Steph. Summer 

MDE lawyer 

Min. Doctor of Law, AUTH

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε την καλύτερη εμπειρία. Μπορείτε να μάθετε περισσότερα σχετικά με τα cookies που χρησιμοποιούμε ή να τα απενεργοποιήσετε Ρυθμίσεις απορρήτου.
ΑποδέχομαιΡυθμίσεις απορρήτου

GDPR

  • Privacy Statement

Privacy Statement

"The processing of personal data is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the General Regulation on the Protection of Personal Data (GDPR 2016/679), any more specific national and European legislation for certain sectors,
of the currently applicable Greek legislation on the protection of personal data, as well as on the protection of personal data and privacy in the field of electronic communications

(Law 3471/2006, as applicable) and the decisions of the Personal Data Protection Authority (PDPA)".  

    1. Purpose

      In the context of offering our products, we collect certain personal data concerning you to facilitate our relationship with you and to provide you with the best possible shopping experience. Through the Privacy Statement we want to explain to you our practices and policies for the collection, use and sharing of data and cookies collected by or about you.

    2. How we collect data

      Your data is collected when you contact us through our contact form, through our order form, through newsletter registration, by phone, or e-mail, or in any other way you may send us your data.

      The thomaskalokiris.com puts the security of your personal data as the 1st priority. For this reason we manage your personal data with care, prudence and according to the National and European Legislation as defined by Law 2472/1997 and Regulation (EU) no. 679/2016 (GDPR).

What data we collect and why

The table below lists the data we collect from you, what we use it for, and why it is necessary in each case.

Purpose of data processing

Privacy

Why data is necessary

Execution of your orders
  • personal identifiers (name and surname)
  • contact details (shipping address, telephone, email address)
  • tax identifiers (TIN, D.O.Y)
  • login information

to enable your registration/login, to complete your order, or to make any refunds.

 

 

 

Handling questions, complaints, troubleshooting
  • personal identifiers (name and surname)
  • contact details (shipping address, telephone, email address)
  • tax identifiers (TIN, D.O.Y)
  • login information

for the correct handling of questions, any complaints and problems. We have a legitimate interest in providing the best experience for our customers and addressing any issues.

 

 

 

Subscribe to newsletter
  • personal identifiers (name and surname)
  • contact details (shipping address, telephone, email address)
so that you can receive updates and offers from our company after you have given your consent
Create a member account using Social Media 
  • personal identifiers (name and surname)
  • contact information (email address)
to place your next orders without having to re-enter your details

 

    1. How long we keep your data

      It is our policy to retain your data only for as long as is necessary for the purpose for which it was collected, in accordance with the principles of data minimization and retention period limitation. For all the above reasons, your data will be kept for at least five (5) years after the end of our customer relationship. In addition, we align the retention of your data with possible variations arising from the exercise of your personal data protection rights.

    2. Disclosure of personal data to third parties

      We will not assign, disclose or rent your personal information to any third party/entity other than as described in this Privacy Statement. Our company transmits personal data to third parties, to whom the company entrusts the processing of personal data on its behalf.

      The data is only transferred to partner companies with ours that provide services for the purpose of sending advertising material and personalized offers. Also, this data is transmitted to companies cooperating with us for the purpose of evaluating the quality of service provision and evaluating our products & services. Also, for the purposes of implementing the sales contract, data is transmitted to cooperating companies that have been assigned the execution of part of the contract, such as transport companies or pick-up points selected by you. Finally, access to the data is given to independent service providers who have built our website, as well as to those who provide us with technical support or hosting for the operation of the website.

      We seek to ensure that all such third party/independent service providers will not use your personal data for any purpose other than to provide the services for which they are contractually bound. We also create contracts with these independent contractors that require them to comply with the personal data protection standards required by law and to use the data only for the purposes for which it was provided.

      Finally, we reserve the right to disclose your personal information to third parties if we are required to disclose or share your personal information to comply with any legal or regulatory obligation.

    3. Data Security

      We go to great lengths to protect our users from unauthorized access or alteration, disclosure or destruction of information in our possession. Specifically:

      1. We encrypt data transfer to and from the website using SSL.
      2. We control our data collection, storage and processing practices, including physical security measures, to protect against unauthorized access to systems.
      3. Access to personal information is limited only to our employees and partner entities who need to know this information to provide services to us. These cooperating entities and the way in which your data is secured are expressly mentioned in this privacy statement.

 

  1. Access by minors

    The products we offer are intended exclusively for purchase by adults and not by children or minors under the age of 16.

    If you are under 16 years of age, you may use our website only with the participation and approval of a parent or guardian.

  2. Use of cookies

    A "cookie" is a small text file that is downloaded to your device when you visit a website and allows the website to obtain certain information from your browser, such as your preferences. We consider it important that you know which cookies are used on our website and for what reasons they are used. The two main categories of cookies used on our website are strictly necessary cookies and third-party cookies:

    Absolutely necessary cookies These cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of our website but also for you to be able to browse it and use its features, such as access to secure areas of the website. Without these cookies, some of the website's services and functions, such as the shopping cart or electronic payment, cannot be carried out

    Cookies of third parties

    Third-party cookies include performance, functionality, and promotion/targeting cookies.

    • Performance cookies: collect information about how visitors use the website, for example which pages they visit most often, and whether they receive error messages from websites. These cookies do not collect information that identifies the visitor. All information collected by these cookies is aggregated and therefore anonymous. They are used only to improve the way a website works
    • Functionality cookies: allow the website to remember the choices you make (such as your username or the region you are in) and provide more personalized features. They can also be used to remember changes you have made to the website or be used to provide services you have requested, such as chatting or using social media. The data collected by these cookies can be made anonymous and cannot track your browsing and your activity on other websites.
    • Promotional/targeting cookies: used to deliver content that is more relevant to you and your interests. They are also used to send targeted advertising or offers, to limit the number of ads shown, and to help measure the effectiveness of advertising campaigns. They may also be used to store the websites you have visited in order to determine the most effective online marketing channels, and to reward external websites and partners who have referred you to our website.

     

  3. Your rights to protect your personal data

    At any point, during the retention or processing of your data, you retain the following rights, and you can make the corresponding requests:

    • Right of access – you have the right to access the personal data we hold about you
    • Right to rectification – you have the right to correct inaccurate or incomplete data we hold about you.
    • Right to erasure – you can request that the data we hold about you be deleted from our records and we are obliged to comply with your request in certain cases
    • Right to restriction of processing – you have the right to request that the processing of your personal data be restricted and we are obliged to comply with this request where certain conditions apply
    • Right to data portability – you have the right to request that the data we hold about you be transferred to another organization
    • Right to object – you have the right to object to processing of personal data concerning you, under certain conditions
    • Right to withdraw consent – where the legal basis for processing your data is “Consent”, you have the right to withdraw your consent at any time.

    All your requests regarding the above rights can be submitted through the special request form or through the management pages of your personal account.

    The procedure for the processing of any request regarding the above rights is as follows. We will evaluate the request and respond to you regarding its progress (request approved, request partially approved, request rejected) as soon as possible and in any case within one month of its submission. In the event that our company rejects your request regarding the above-mentioned Personal Data Protection Rights, we will communicate the reasons for the rejection. You have the right to file a complaint directly with the regulatory authority and our company's Data Protection Officer.

    We reserve the right to reject requests that are unreasonably repetitive, require disproportionate technical effort or have disproportionate technical consequences, endanger the privacy of others, or are impossible to implement.

  4. Changes to the Privacy Statement

    Our Privacy Statement may change from time to time. We endeavor to constantly review and update this Statement in order to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements while providing the best protection for your personal data. We will post any changes to the privacy statement on this page.

en_USEnglish